[10]
by CMS. Issuers must provide DIFS with evidence of CMS’ approval for each data change.
Accreditation
45 CFR 155.1045 establishes the timeline by which issuers offering plans on- Marketplace must be accredited
by NCQA, URAC, or AAAHC. An issuer’s accreditation status will be available to consumers at the Marketplace
website. Please include Accrediting Information in the SERFF Binder in the Company and Contact tab.
Summary of Benefits and Coverage and Schedule of Benefits
DIFS requires use of the 2021 form of Summary of Benefits and Coverage (SBC) as posted by CCIIO on
February 3, 2020. This form applies to individual and small group on-Marketplace plans. The materials are
available here. Each plan must have its own unique SBC, with the associated URL link, submitted via the
MPMS Module.
For PY25, DIFS requires issuers file the required SBCs in the forms tab of the Form/Rate filing. The SBC and
the Schedule of Benefits must include the Plan ID from the Plans and Benefits Template in the name. Each
SBC must then be associated with the Plan to which it applies in the Binder. The requirements for unique SBCs
and URL link filings remain the same as in PY23.
SECTION 4: RATING REQUIREMENTS (APPLICABLE TO ALL PLANS)
DIFS will not accept more than one filing per market (individual or small group). Issuers that offer both PPO/EPO
and HMO/POS must submit both filings in the same Form/Rate filing.
Per 45 CFR 154.200, the Part II Justification remains at 15% and is applicable by plan, not the overall rate
change.
Required Cost-Sharing Variations for Individual Market Plans Only
45 CFR 156.420 requires several cost-sharing plan variations for issuers offering coverage in the individual
market on-Marketplace. Issuers must submit for approval the three plan variations for each silver plan offered,
and the zero and limited cost-sharing variations for each plan at the platinum, gold, silver, and bronze metal
levels.
In August 2020, the Court of Appeals of the Federal Circuit Court concluded that issuers are entitled to unpaid
CSRs, with the expectation that the unpaid CSRs will be offset in some manner for issuers’ CSR premium
loading. The decision could lead to CSR payments being restored by either Congress or HHS, but neither has
taken action to date. As a result, DIFS will continue to require issuers to submit rates assuming no CSR
payments will be made (CSR load) for PY25. If CSR payments are restored by either Congress or HHS prior
to the finalization of rates, DIFS may require companies to update their rates to remove the CSR provision.
These rates apply only to on-Marketplace silver plan premiums.
The actuarial memorandum should disclose the amount of CSR load included in the silver plan rates and a
detailed description of the methodology for determining the load. The CSR load should reflect reasonably
anticipated CSR costs, using the expected cost sharing and distribution of enrollees across the silver plan
variants. Issuers that develop CSR loads at the plan level should clearly identify the CSR loads for each plan
and provide the member distributions and expected unfunded subsidies that support each plan’s CSR load. If
historic ACA incurred/paid claims were used to develop the Cost-Sharing Design factor, the impact of CSR
subsidies in the experience period is already included and will need to be removed before applying the CSR